Record the authorized literature-development loop and frozen eight-state A/B/C/D/E comparison, repairing source fields, query context, acquisition receipts, stop closure and observed-action registration. Feedback control is supported; ordinary active design matches the paired result, leaving separate harness gains unestablished.
Philosophy
Separate the value of feedback from any added benefit of the current single-step control fields, letting strong controls shape the next design.
Architecture & control flow
- 01
Source layer: Build a source store from an operator-supplied local manifest. Body, abstract and supplementary text retain distinct roles, page/section locators, versions, hashes, availability and query windows.
- 02
Proposal layer: The model reads a bounded evidence packet and returns a question, rivals, an idea and candidate actions. A strict structure contract bounds fields and size; predicted outcomes cannot become observed results.
- 03
Controller layer: Micro policy ranks declared response separation and action cost. Macro policy retains branches and pending actions, selecting affordable dependency-ready obligations and rotating stale untested branches.
- 04
Host execution layer: Selected actions pass identity, source, semantics and cost gates. Literature actions execute locally; experimental probes observe only after host domain-adapter attestation. Without an adapter, experiments remain proposals or human checkpoints.
- 05
Feedback layer: Observed responses conditionally update rivals; anomalies, noise and uncertified mappings remain unresolved. Revisions explain introduced, revived and removed rivals. Review separates discriminating question observations from independently validated idea mechanisms.
- 06
Persistent record layer: Proposals, selections, rejections, budgets and outcomes enter content-addressed objects and a host HMAC chain. Complete rounds save state checkpoints, and reports provide readable projections. Source and runtime identities stay locked across resume.
Architecture outline derived from this version’s control flow.
Implementation & evidence scope
Current evidence covers engineering contracts, literature development and bounded computational diagnostics. Open-domain new actions, full long-horizon graph gains, cross-task transfer and RSI remain research goals.
Code & bundled material
The introduction draws on bundled notes, changelogs and central code. Software tests, synthetic diagnostics and scientific effectiveness use different evidence standards.
Source references
README.md· 3–11docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md· 7–9docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md· 48–62docs/v7/INTERFACES.md· 48–60docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md· 7–25docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md· 40–46docs/v7/results/2026-10-01_v73_studies.json· 9–9docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md· 27–38docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md· 92–98docs/v7/results/2026-10-01_v73_studies.json· 376–376README.md· 82–82docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md· 108–112dist/7.3.0_VALIDATION.json· 18–18README.md· 80–80docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md· 64–90docs/v7/SELECTIVE_REPAIR_CONTROLLER.zh-CN.md· 1–9docs/v7/STAGEWISE_EXPLORATION_STUDY.zh-CN.md· 1–3README.md· 11–11README.md· 65–65README.md· 78–78docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md· 104–110docs/v7/results/2026-10-01_v73_studies.json· 7–8
Research-record date ·