AutoResearch/Idea discovery subproject
Version library

VERSION / V7.3.0

Aletheia

Source-grounded exploration and eight-state feedback diagnostics

Current version

Record the authorized literature-development loop and frozen eight-state A/B/C/D/E comparison, repairing source fields, query context, acquisition receipts, stop closure and observed-action registration. Feedback control is supported; ordinary active design matches the paired result, leaving separate harness gains unestablished.

Philosophy

Separate the value of feedback from any added benefit of the current single-step control fields, letting strong controls shape the next design.

Architecture & control flow

  1. 01

    Source layer: Build a source store from an operator-supplied local manifest. Body, abstract and supplementary text retain distinct roles, page/section locators, versions, hashes, availability and query windows.

  2. 02

    Proposal layer: The model reads a bounded evidence packet and returns a question, rivals, an idea and candidate actions. A strict structure contract bounds fields and size; predicted outcomes cannot become observed results.

  3. 03

    Controller layer: Micro policy ranks declared response separation and action cost. Macro policy retains branches and pending actions, selecting affordable dependency-ready obligations and rotating stale untested branches.

  4. 04

    Host execution layer: Selected actions pass identity, source, semantics and cost gates. Literature actions execute locally; experimental probes observe only after host domain-adapter attestation. Without an adapter, experiments remain proposals or human checkpoints.

  5. 05

    Feedback layer: Observed responses conditionally update rivals; anomalies, noise and uncertified mappings remain unresolved. Revisions explain introduced, revived and removed rivals. Review separates discriminating question observations from independently validated idea mechanisms.

  6. 06

    Persistent record layer: Proposals, selections, rejections, budgets and outcomes enter content-addressed objects and a host HMAC chain. Complete rounds save state checkpoints, and reports provide readable projections. Source and runtime identities stay locked across resume.

Architecture outline derived from this version’s control flow.

Implementation & evidence scope

Current evidence covers engineering contracts, literature development and bounded computational diagnostics. Open-domain new actions, full long-horizon graph gains, cross-task transfer and RSI remain research goals.

Code & bundled material

The introduction draws on bundled notes, changelogs and central code. Software tests, synthetic diagnostics and scientific effectiveness use different evidence standards.

Source references
  • README.md · 3–11
  • docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md · 7–9
  • docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md · 48–62
  • docs/v7/INTERFACES.md · 48–60
  • docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md · 7–25
  • docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md · 40–46
  • docs/v7/results/2026-10-01_v73_studies.json · 9–9
  • docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md · 27–38
  • docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md · 92–98
  • docs/v7/results/2026-10-01_v73_studies.json · 376–376
  • README.md · 82–82
  • docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md · 108–112
  • dist/7.3.0_VALIDATION.json · 18–18
  • README.md · 80–80
  • docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md · 64–90
  • docs/v7/SELECTIVE_REPAIR_CONTROLLER.zh-CN.md · 1–9
  • docs/v7/STAGEWISE_EXPLORATION_STUDY.zh-CN.md · 1–3
  • README.md · 11–11
  • README.md · 65–65
  • README.md · 78–78
  • docs/v7/V73_RESEARCH_REPORT.zh-CN.md · 104–110
  • docs/v7/results/2026-10-01_v73_studies.json · 7–8

Research-record date ·